At the moment, we are seeing three clear trends emerge in the way the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) is dealing with adjudication business, each of which is lead by one of the TCC judges:
- Akenhead J has given judgments on severability of the adjudicator’s decision (click here for an example).
- Coulson J has given judgments on using the CPR Part 8 procedure in adjudication cases, both before, during and after the adjudicator has reached his decision (click here for an example).
- Ramsey J has given judgments allowing leeway on, or applying a purposive construction to, “deficiencies” in notices of adjudication and referral notices (click here for an example).
This is a busy time for the TCC, as we have previously reported. Will 2009 see these trends develop further, fall away, or be joined by other new aspects to modern contentious construction practice? Only time will tell.