-  March 14, 2018 
                  Are you being served (electronically)? Email service under the CPR and the Party Wall Act 1996Two recent cases, one in the Court of Appeal, the other in the Supreme Court, have created significant uncertainty around the acceptability of email service. It seems that there may now be a disparity between the CPR and the Party Wall Act 1996, despite the similarities in the wording of the relevant provisions for the … Continue reading Are you being served (electronically)? Email service under the CPR and the Party Wall Act 1996 → 
-  June 30, 2017 
                  Issues highlighted by GB Building Ltd v SFS Fire Services LtdPractical completion is a key concept in any construction project. It has a significant impact on a party’s rights and obligations, and represents a major milestone in the overall project timetable. Under the majority of construction projects, it marks the point at which the clock starts running for the overall transfer of risk from the … Continue reading Issues highlighted by GB Building Ltd v SFS Fire Services Ltd → 
-  November 2, 2016 
                  Beware the dangers of uncertainty with letters of intentAlexander Nissen QC’s recent decision in Spartafield Ltd v Penten Group Ltd brings a degree of finality to the long-running dispute between these two parties. It comes after multiple adjudications and previous proceedings in the TCC. Back in March, my colleague Ebony Alleyne discussed what was then the most recent judgment, dealing with the enforcement … Continue reading Beware the dangers of uncertainty with letters of intent → 
-  April 29, 2016 
                  Know what you are dealing with: lessons learned from Murphy v BecktonCarr J’s judgment in J Murphy & Sons Ltd v Beckton Energy Ltd offers a salutary reminder of the dangers that can befall a contractor when dealing with an unfamiliar amended contract. Not getting to grips with the operation of amended clauses, and the interplay between them, can be a trap for the unwary, as J Murphy … Continue reading Know what you are dealing with: lessons learned from Murphy v Beckton → 
 
						     
							        
							        
							        
							        
							        
							        
							        
							       



