Monthly Archives: October 2008

REUTERS | Jose Miguel Gomez

A less than serious post to kick off this blog:

A Google engineer has developed a way to avoid random emailing late at night when you’re most likely to be “tired”. Jon Perlow’s new Mail Goggles application, built into Google’s GMail service, forces the user to answer basic maths questions in 60 seconds before a message can be sent on its way.

Should this be applied to correspondence between warring parties when construction projects get into dispute?  Continue reading

REUTERS | Jose Miguel Gomez

Everyone involved in construction and engineering appreciates the effort involved in planning a project and choosing an appropriate procurement strategy. All too often that work is undermined by careless errors made when compiling the contract documents into a formal agreement. The resulting disputes can be expensive and time-consuming. Here are some tips for avoiding trouble: Continue reading

REUTERS | Ognen Teofilovski

If the challenge is made early in the proceedings, before the responding party has incurred substantial costs, then I am more likely to resign.

The recent cases of Birmingham City Council v Paddison Construction Ltd [2008] EWHC 2254 and Benfield Construction Ltd v Trudson (Hatton) Ltd  [2008] EWHC 2333(see PLC’s update), (and the previous case of HG Construction Ltd v Ashwell Homes (East Anglia) Ltd [2007] EWHC 144) have reminded everyone of the dangers of trying to adjudicate the same dispute more than once. Continue reading

Share this post on: