REUTERS | Ina Fassbender

November 2012 digest: adjudicators’ fees and severing their decisions

William Wordsworth, Resolution and Independence:

“There was a roaring in the wind all night, the rain came heavily and fell in floods, but now the sun is rising, calm and bright.”

Our monthly digest often starts with a weather-related quote, and this month is no exception, what with all the rain and flooding that the country has recently experienced.

Away from the flooding (but still on the topic of natural disasters), during November Caroline Pope looked at some of the consequences of the 2009 Italian earthquake, Muhammed Haque discussed preventing tree root claims and the court looked at the consequences of a fire in a pool house (which Michael Mendelblat discussed).

On the adjudication front, we have seen:

The courts have also been looking at a range of issues, including whether:

The Court of Appeal also considered how the Canada Steamship principles have been affected by the modern approach to contractual interpretation.

Elsewhere, the government has announced a “one-in, two-out” regulation policy, published a draft project agreement for school buildings and continued to comment on the European sales law proposals. The RIBA published 2012 versions of its appointments and we told you all about extensions of time after practical completion. We also added BIM provisions to our JCT Schedules of Amendments.

In public procurement, the court found errors in a procurement, a procurement policy note on bidders’ past performance was published, we had a discussion on the cost of procurement challenges (by Catherine Gelder) and a monthly case review.

Finally, PLC’s campaign on the countdown to the Jackson reforms has begun. We may not know the details of all the changes yet, but it’s good to be prepared.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share this post on: