All posts by busbyd

REUTERS | Jumana ElHeloueh

Nothing ever seems to go smoothly when a claim under the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930 is in prospect. Upon insolvency of an insured this provides for the insured’s rights under any insurance policy it holds to be transferred to a third party for the purpose of enabling the third party to claim against the insurer.

Continue reading

REUTERS | Ognen Teofilovski

Everyone involved in the construction industry is familiar with the terms “interim binding” and “final and binding”, especially when referring to the effect of a certificate. Equally, they are familiar with the idea that an adjudicator’s decision is an interim one, which can only be overturned by a court, arbitrator or by agreement.

So, you can imagine my surprise when I read Edwards-Stuart J’s recent judgment in Straw Realisations v Shaftsbury House. Continue reading

REUTERS | Kim Hong-Ji

Whose job is it anyway?

As Matt Molloy observed in his blog post last week, it is rare to find a quantity surveyor (QS) being sued in what one might term a “traditional” construction dispute, such as, for instance, the renovation of a domestic dwelling.

Why is that? No QS would ever claim that it is because every QS is always perfect. Instead, it seems to me that the answer can be found by posing a rather simpler question first: on a construction project, who does what? Continue reading

REUTERS | Eduardo Munoz

According to the Office for National Statistics, between 2007 and 2009 construction output in the UK fell by just under 12.5%. And, although recent figures suggest that 2010 may see some improvement on the 2009 nadir, no-one seems particularly confident that the industry will return to pre-2007 levels any time soon, even after the meagre new rations offered out in the government spending review.

Continue reading

REUTERS | Ahmad Masood

Last month I wrote about parties subsequently appointing an adjudicator as their expert, and the potential for the adjudicator/expert to be, or appear to be, biased. It was interesting that the post attracted two comments, with each one putting one side of the argument in a situation where the adjudicator was subsequently invited to act as a solicitor for one of the parties.

That got me thinking about situations where the adjudicator is appointed multiple times, either by the same parties on one project, or by one party on different projects.

Continue reading

REUTERS | Eduardo Munoz

With the long term rise of design and build contracting, some commentators in the insurance industry also point to an increase in cases where a design and build insurer refuses cover in the event of a claim. This clearly affects the contractor, but employers need to be careful too, as the absence of insurance coverage may seriously limit their financial recovery.

What can an employer do to protect its position? Continue reading

REUTERS | Andrew Winning

It isn’t often that you see quantity surveyors caught up in an adjudication as one of the parties, although they often feature heavily in other respects (as the parties’ experts, representatives or even as the adjudicator). In fact, I am not personally aware of a claim against a quantity surveyor, although I have seen breach of duty claims against other members of the professional team (like engineers and architects). Quantity surveyors do not seem to feature much in court cases either.

I’m not sure any of this means quantity surveyors are perfect, but there must be a reason why they aren’t sued that often. Continue reading

REUTERS | Tobias Schwarz

How to settle a dispute

Another Saturday afternoon in Panama (I’ll be permanently back in the UK at the end of October), and I am sitting on the balcony again with the ubiquitous milky coffee. But instead of staring out into the Pacific and letting my mind wander I’ve been reading Tony Blair’s book. Whether or not you are a fan I would definitely recommend it.

Continue reading

REUTERS | Ognen Teofilovski

Bonfire of the quangos

Francis Maude, Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General, has announced that 192 public bodies (quangos) will be abolished (including the Design Council), with others being restructured (for example the Home and Communities Agency (HCA) and the Environment Agency (EA)), and some still on hold pending further review (see below). Continue reading

Share this post on: