Monthly Archives: September 2019

REUTERS | REUTERS/ Ilya Naymushin
September 24, 2019

Mentoring and pupil adjudicators

Way back in the depths of time (well January 2009 to be exact), I first wrote about how I would like to see a pupillage system for budding adjudicators. At the time, I said it was to address the fact that the process is now far more complex than was envisaged when it all started.

Since then, I have elaborated on my view that we need to offer practical, hands-on experience to budding adjudicators and I’ve told you all about my mentoring scheme. I’m not alone in offering a mentoring scheme, as the judgment in Dickie & Moore Ltd v McLeish and others demonstrates. However, the question remains: should adjudicator mentoring rest in the hands of a few concerned individuals, or should it be more structured? Continue reading →

REUTERS | Vasily Fedosenko
September 18, 2019

Assignment and performance bonds: Sumitomo Mitsui v Euler Hermes

The courts enjoy a fairly regular diet of cases concerning the validity of calls on performance bonds and similar securities. I have blogged on this before, in early 2017.

Bond issuers who are reluctant to pay out on a bond will raise either:

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp Europe Ltd v Euler Hermes Europe SA (NV), heard by Butcher J in the Commercial Court a couple of weeks ago, is a formal defence case, which grapples with the situation where the original beneficiary has tried to assign the benefit of the bond to a third party, and problems with that assignment cause problems for the ultimate beneficiary. Continue reading →

REUTERS | Heinz-Peter Bader
September 17, 2019

Going for gold – FIDIC publishes its golden principles

Another blog, another new FIDIC publication. This time it’s the FIDIC Golden Principles, first edition, 2019 which was officially launched at the FIDIC Asia Pacific Contract Users’ Conference in Hong Kong on 25 June 2019. I touched on FIDIC’s development of the “Golden Principles” (GPs) in a previous blog post, Amending FIDIC contracts: practical issues. In this blog, I look at them in a little more detail.

To start, I should clarify that this is not the first time that we have seen the GPs. They made their first appearance in the guidance notes to the Second Editions of the Rainbow Suite in December 2017 and were also included with the FIDIC Emerald Book published in May this year. However, they were limited to the principles themselves (discussed below). The new stand-alone guide provides context by explaining what the GPs are and the reasons behind them, as well as offering additional guidance on how to draft amendments to FIDIC contracts. The FIDIC GPs document is freely available to download from FIDIC’s online bookshop.  Continue reading →

REUTERS | REUTERS/Eric Gaillard
September 10, 2019

Court of Appeal’s useful guidance on implying isolated payment provisions from the Scheme

For some years now modular construction has been on the increase for new buildings, particularly in the hotel sector where it is now the norm for new hotels to be supplied with bathrooms and bedrooms manufactured off site. Indeed, I suspect that most of us have stayed in such rooms without even realising that more or less everything in the room (except the loose furniture) was installed off site, and sometimes many thousands of miles off-site.

It may be because I only see the projects where things have gone awry and disputes have arisen, but, having decided a few disputes regarding modular building products, it’s clear that this part of the industry remains susceptible to the types of disputes we see with more traditional methods of construction.

I want to talk about one such case this week, namely the Court of Appeal’s decision in Bennett (Construction) Ltd v CIMC MBS Ltd (formerly Verbus Systems Ltd) (which it handed-down at the end of August).  Continue reading →

REUTERS | Toby Melville
September 3, 2019

VAT reverse charge

What is the reverse charge?

Coming into effect on 1 October 2019, the reverse charge in relation to building and construction services is set to bring about a major change in how VAT is handled in the construction sector. All those involved – including developers – need to be aware of when it will apply and how it will work.

The reverse charge will require the recipient of services, rather than the supplier, to account for VAT. This requirement will apply throughout the chain of suppliers, up to the point where the recipient of the services is an “end user”. The “end user” concept is critical and we will look at this in more detail below. Continue reading →

Share this post on: