Monthly Archives: June 2013

REUTERS | Sukree Sukplang

The times they are a-changin’…

It was almost 20 years ago that Sir Michael Latham called on the construction industry to change its ways and embrace collaborative working (Constructing the Team, 1994). We know these things take time but are we now finally facing the dawning of the age of Latham?

It is clear that new contracts are being used and the flood of recent cases on good faith and cooperation obligations reflect that change, with TSG v South Anglia being the latest example.

The increasing use of alliancing will also mean the courts have to look at new types of obligations and contractual arrangements. When the courts do that, they should recognise the background to this change. Maybe not quite what Bob Dylan was thinking of in 1964 but perhaps just as radical (at least for us construction people). Continue reading

REUTERS | Jason Lee

The extent to which a party may be obliged to sacrifice its own commercial interests in complying with an “endeavours” obligation in a commercial contract is an issue to which there is no easy answer. A different but related issue was considered in two recent cases: whether a party who is in financial difficulty can rely on an “endeavours” provision to avoid other contractual obligations.

Continue reading

REUTERS | Jason Lee

Hastings pier opened in 1872, enjoyed its prime in the 1930s and was a popular music venue in the 1960s, with many notable bands (including the Who and the Rolling Stones) playing there.

Like so many Victorian piers, since then, the pier was not kept in good repair (it also suffered major storm damage). Consequently, in June 2006 Hastings Borough Council exercised “emergency” powers under section 78 of the Building Act 1984 (BA 1984) to close the pier to the public. The local authority was concerned about its structural integrity. However, by closing the pier to public access, it closed the tenant’s bingo hall and amusement arcade.

There followed a claim (by way of an assignment) by the tenant for statutory compensation under section 106 of the BA 1984 and the matter came before Ramsey J, who delivered judgment earlier this year. Continue reading

Share this post on: