Monthly Archives: November 2012

REUTERS | Jason Lee

Whether the Construction Act 1996 applied to letters of intent was an issue that troubled practitioners and the courts for a number of years. From the various cases that considered this issue, the answer seemed to be that each case would turn on its own facts (that classic lawyerly phrase!), but the Act would apply if the letter of intent was a “complete agreement”. In other words, if the letter of intent satisfied the requirements of section 107, the parties were “parties to a construction contract“.

So, what happens to letters of intent now that section 107 has been repealed? Continue reading

REUTERS | Luke MacGregor

The recent cases of Denness v East Hampshire District Council and Robbins v London Borough of Bexley have shed further light where property damage is alleged to have been caused by the roots of adjacent trees.

Both property and tree owners will be affected by these decisions as the long-held view that liability is always established merely by the proximity of trees to buildings built on shrinkable soils may well be confined to history. Continue reading

Share this post on: