Monthly Archives: August 2010

REUTERS | Beawiharta

Over the last couple of years, a number of adjudication cases have looked at whether a party seeking to enforce an adjudicator’s decision could argue something different in court to the case it presented to the adjudicator. While some call it “approbating and reprobating“, I prefer and can understand the term “blowing hot and cold”.

HHJ Havery QC said in Redworth Construction Ltd v Brookdale Healthcare Ltd [2006] EWHC 1994 (TCC) that you cannot do it. Somerfield recently ran the argument before Akenhead J in Nickleby FM Ltd v Somerfield Stores Ltd. Continue reading

REUTERS | Kim Hong-Ji

No doubt there will be considerable column inches written in the coming days (not to mention the many water-cooler discussions taking place) over the Scottish court’s latest decision in City Inn v Shepherd.

I’m not surprised, as it is rare these days to see a judgment that tackles issues such as concurrent delay and extension of time. As Alastair Walls notes, adjudication has all but replaced court-based litigation in construction disputes and therefore what happens in practice so often remains behind the “closed doors” of that process. Continue reading

Share this post on: