Monthly Archives: June 2010

REUTERS | Mike Blake

Yesterday evening the Construction Projects Knowledge Management Association invited Mr Justice Ramsey to speak to members and their guests at Keating Chambers. The topic for discussion was the impact of the electronic age on documentation, in terms of:

  • E-disclosure problems and solutions.
  • E-working in the TCC.

Both the topics pre-date the Jackson report and much has been written about them. That said, there remains a tendency for practitioners to view them as reforms for the future, rather than part and parcel of the here and now. Continue reading

REUTERS | Petar Kujundzic

The title sounds like an exam question, but is there any truth in the statement?

Since 2008 and the decision in Cantillon v Urvasco, the TCC has been considering the knotty problem of what to do with an adjudicator’s decision when part of the decision is unenforceable for some reason or other. Long gone are the days when it is a simple “all or nothing” on enforcement. Continue reading

REUTERS | Ognen Teofilovski

Of the various areas of law that make up what is known as “construction law”, I think it is fair to say that negligence and whether a certain loss is recoverable is perhaps the most complex and one which, still today, many years after a snail was found in a bottle of ginger beer, gives rise to the most uncertainty.

That uncertainty concerns, amongst other things, the question of whether the damage caused is to “other property” (when the loss is normally recoverable) or to “the thing itself” (when the loss is not normally recoverable, as it constitutes economic loss). Continue reading

Share this post on: