Monthly Archives: June 2009

REUTERS | Robert Pratta

June saw the JCT publish its official “guides” to the changes included in the 2009 revisions to its standard form contracts. Unlike previous JCT guides, these do not give a detailed description of the changes made by the 2009 Revisions. We’ve been looking at the JCT Standard Building Contract, 2005 edition (SBC05). To assist construction practitioners who would otherwise have to carry out their own comparison of the changes, we are working through the amendments and publishing as we go. Continue reading

REUTERS | Yuriko Nakao

Do you have a construction contract?” Unsurprisingly, this often-asked question is the starting point for deciding whether a party has a right to refer a dispute to adjudication.

If one party is a residential occupier, there can only be an adjudication if the parties have a contractual right to refer a dispute to adjudication. There can only be a contractual right to refer if there is a contract. Continue reading

REUTERS | Jose Miguel Gomez

In the recent case of Siemens Building Technologies FE Limited v Supershield Ltd, the TCC considered the circumstances in which a party may settle a claim against it and recoup the amount of that settlement from another party.

This is a common scenario in construction and engineering disputes, which routinely involve a large number of parties, some of whom are “stuck in the middle”, defending claims whilst at the same time seeking to pass on liability to others further down the contractual chain. Continue reading

Share this post on: